Worked example

See a completed set for a connected field sprayer

Brannvik Agri Systems AB (fictional) places the SprayLine M24-H on the market in March 2027. It reuses its Machinery Regulation file and adds what ISO 24882 asks for.

Get the free overview

What the example shows

14: scenarios assessed; all residual risks at level 2 or below
14 of 25: technical topics verified by passed tests
7: open gaps, each with an owner and a due date
25: files, consistent ID by ID

Inside the example files

Seven excerpts from the completed example, one per module. Select a module to see the file.

AG-04: likelihood and risk are calculated — Likelihood follows from the exposure of the entry interface and the attacker effort; risk from the impact. Every risk of 3 or more is reduced.

One thread through the files

InterfaceIF-03
LTE to the cloud service; outbound only
ScenarioRS-01
A remote command unfolds the boom during road travel
TopicTR-22
Command filter on the internal link
TestT-01, T-03
Results in the Machinery file EX_MR-08

Habits the example teaches

Reuse before you write

The nine risks of the Machinery file become the first nine scenarios. Only five new ones are added, for the CRA side.

Assess your side of the cable

The sprayer is assessed; the host tractor is not. The ISOBUS connection is treated as a way in from outside.

Calculate, don't argue

Likelihood and risk come from a fixed table, so two engineers reach the same rating.

Planned is not passed

Six tests are still planned, so seven topics stay open until they pass.

Supplier dates are your dates

The gateway module is supported for less time than the sprayer; that is a gap now, with a successor plan.

Name the edition

Every mapping states that it uses the draft numbering, and a gap tracks the re-mapping.

Get the free overview

Brannvik Agri Systems AB and the SprayLine M24-H are fictional. Every example file is marked as fictional and is for illustration only.